*Subtitles: Choose “Subtitles/CC” in the “Settings” (gear icon) at the bottom right of the YouTube video.
*Subtitles may not show with multiple languages or overlapping audio.


The panelists define dignity as the recognition of each person’s inherent value, autonomy, and right to participate fully in society. Dignity is central to discussions of gender and inclusion because it underscores the human impact of exclusion and discrimination. Beyond diversity policies, institutions can actively promote inclusion through transparent hiring and promotion practices, mentorship programs, inclusive curricula, and rights-based policy frameworks. Unintentional exclusion often occurs through rigid hierarchies, gendered assumptions, or policies that overlook marginalized groups. Persistent biases include assumptions about competence, stigma around sexual orientation or gender identity, and unequal access to leadership opportunities.

Engaging conservative or resistant institutional spaces requires culturally sensitive approaches, framing inclusion as a shared benefit, and building incremental trust. “Leaving no one behind” means ensuring all voices are heard, particularly those historically marginalized, and translating human rights principles into actionable policies. Media narratives shape public understanding by either reinforcing stereotypes or promoting visibility for underrepresented groups. Legal reforms are necessary but insufficient; cultural and organizational change is essential for lasting impact. Academic institutions have a dual role: analyzing inequalities and actively dismantling structural barriers through education, research, and policy engagement. Examples from both Japan and Belgium illustrate successful initiatives that restored dignity and inclusion, providing hope for transformative change. Young generations play a key role in reshaping norms, while sustained advocacy and cross-sector collaboration offer paths toward equality and social inclusion.

【Reflection】
The panel on Gender, Dignity and Social Inclusion proved to be a truly powerful and thought-provoking discussion between three distinguished academics. Several memorable quotes resonated strongly with the audience, leaving a lasting impression that carried into the keynotes and panels that followed throughout the Peace, Human Security and Dignity Week. These moments underlined the importance of the panel and its contribution to shaping the week’s broader conversations.

Beyond the intellectual depth of the discussion, the panel also served as an important opportunity for exchange between our universities. The speakers not only shared insights but also took the concrete step of exchanging contact details in order to remain in touch. This outcome aligned closely with one of the central goals of the week: to foster connections that extend beyond the Expo and lead to lasting collaboration.

In fact, Belgian universities had expressed a clear need for more international cooperation in the fields of gender studies and related disciplines. This panel offered a meaningful step forward in addressing that need. By bringing together scholars from different backgrounds, the event helped lay the groundwork for future partnerships, research collaborations, and academic dialogue. I believe we succeeded in establishing an initial bridge that can be built upon in the months and years to come.

Another striking element of the discussion was the way the speakers embraced the inclusion of dignity as a central theme. Dignity is often overlooked in academic and policy discussions, where the focus tends to be placed solely on gender or social inclusion. By explicitly integrating dignity into the conversation, the panel broadened the framework through which these issues can be understood. It reminded us that equality and inclusion cannot be fully achieved if the inherent dignity of individuals is ignored. This aspect gave the discussion a unique richness and set it apart from similar debates.

Overall, the panel combined intellectual depth, emotional resonance, and practical outcomes. It left a strong mark not only on me personally but also on the wider audience, as evidenced by how often its themes were revisited in later sessions of the week. I came away with a sense of encouragement, knowing that the discussions sparked here can have a real impact in shaping future research and collaborations in gender studies and beyond.


【Post EXPO Initiatives】
At this stage, there are no specific initiatives visibly planned following the Expo. However, one of the key objectives of our events, including the Gender, Dignity and Social Inclusion panel, was to foster connections between universities and scholars from different countries. The panel successfully facilitated these exchanges, as evidenced by the speakers sharing contact details and expressing interest in continuing dialogue.

While concrete projects or programs have not yet been formalized, the relationships established during the Expo provide a strong foundation for future collaboration. Belgian universities, in particular, have highlighted the need for more international engagement in gender studies and related fields. The connections made during the week offer promising opportunities for joint research, academic exchanges, and long-term partnerships.

In that sense, the impact of the Expo extends beyond immediate initiatives: it has sparked conversations, built networks, and opened doors for collaboration that could develop over time. The focus remains on nurturing these connections so that the shared knowledge, experiences, and ideas from the Expo can evolve into meaningful, collaborative projects in the future.